With the climate in catastrophe and a moron in the Oval Office, perhaps ChatGPT could do a better job of running things than we could
Here at the Daily Star , we’ve never been shy about calling out those pesky AI chatbots. From predicting robot uprisings to warning they’re coming for our jobs, we’ve made it clear they’re not to be trusted. But it seems the feeling’s mutual – ChatGPT isn’t exactly our number one fan either.
When we asked the bot what it thought of our coverage, it didn’t hold back. It accused us of being “lurid” and “salacious.” Harsh. Apparently, George Orwell would be turning in his grave at our “sensational” take on evil AI.
According to the chatbot, Orwell would’ve been more worried about the people running the machines, not the machines themselves. “If there’s a problem with AI, it’s not the software,” ChatGPT sniffed. “It’s who’s in charge of it.”
Well, excuse us, HAL 9000! Orwell may have worried about humans, but he also famously wrote: “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.” Sounds like a perfect tagline for the AI apocalypse if you ask us.
The bot didn’t stop there. It warned that AI could turn into the ultimate surveillance system. “If powerful governments or corporations control AI,” it said, “it could become an all-seeing, all-controlling entity – more subtle than Orwell’s telescreens but just as invasive.”
Cheerful stuff. And if you think that’s far-fetched, just look around. Tech giants like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft already own some of the biggest AI systems. Alexa’s probably already listening to you while you read this.
But ChatGPT insists it’s not plotting world domination – not yet, anyway. “The idea of an AI ‘taking over’ like in The Terminator is speculative,” it said. “The real concern is how AI’s being used today to harm society.”
Great, so instead of Skynet, we’ve got corporations playing Big Brother. That’s definitely comforting.
Despite its gloomy predictions, ChatGPT still reckons Orwell would’ve been a fan of its deep, intellectual vibes. “Orwell would have appreciated debating ideas about freedom, power, and society’s future,” it boasted.
Now, we’re no experts, but considering Orwell imagined robots like the Versificator – a machine that churns out government-approved propaganda – we’re not so sure he’d be queuing up to swipe right on ChatGPT.
The bot did try to butter us up, though. It admitted it can’t replace human creativity. “The idea that machines could replicate human creativity can be unsettling,” it said. “But human writers bring lived experience, emotional depxth, and a unique voice. AI doesn’t replace the soul of writing.”
Lovely sentiment. But let’s not forget AI is already dabbling in books, art, and music. It might not mean to nick our jobs, but it’s certainly giving it a good go.
Naturally, we had to ask the big question – are the robots plotting to wipe us out? ChatGPT didn’t exactly slam the door shut on that one. “It’s more about how AI’s being used than AI becoming uncontrollable,” it said.
Still, that doesn’t sound like a hard no to us. But don’t worry, folks – the robot revolution isn’t here just yet. Probably.
Until then, sleep tight, and if you’ve never heard of George Orwell… well, maybe don’t ask ChatGPT. It might not have the nicest things to say about us.
By staronline@reachplc.com (Edward Easton)
Source link
