Dates judge you for how much rent you pay

Location, location, location: In love as in real estate, it turns out that geography matters — a lot.

Living on the “wrong side of the tracks” can cost you your relationship, according to a new survey, which found 66 percent of women and 56 percent of men would break it off if they found out their date lived in a “rough” neighborhood.

Lifestyle website House Method surveyed more than 1,000 single men and women and found a number of surprising results in regards to geographic turn-ons and turnoffs by gender.

For ladies, a potential partner who lives with their parents was a big no-no for over 80 percent of respondents. Men felt less strongly about lovers living at home, but more strongly about dates with roommates: Almost 40 percent of men surveyed would end a relationship if they found out about their lover didn’t live alone.

Turns out, bae isn’t often willing to go the distance — at least not when it means a serious schlep. While not quite as big a turnoff as living in a part of town perceived to be “bad,” the study found that more than 30 percent of singles aren’t willing to make it work for someone living too far away.

And BTW: “too far away” can sometimes mean in the same damn town. More than 30 minutes of dating commute time just wasn’t worth it for many “kings and queens of convenience,” survey co-author and the site’s brand editor Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza tells The Post.

The survey’s findings, Esparza says, ultimately speak to a deeper, more disturbing trend than location alone, telling “us something about how perceived financial compatibility factors into dating relationships. We’re just simply not as likely to want to date someone whom we perceive to be less socioeconomically well off.”