After contacting her health trust for her regular repeat prescription, she said she was told there were no supplies of Nabilone available.

She was told to contact her neurologist and has since been prescribed other medication.

Kenning said the alternatives had not been effective and that her health had declined to the point where she had to stay in hospital for several nights.

“I don’t want to be here any more because the pain is so bad,” she said.

“I don’t know how to describe it.

“I have been living on painkillers… I can’t sleep, I’m sick, I’m not eating.”

Kenning said more should have been done to prepare patients for the disruption.

“How do I live my life? How do I cope with the pain?” she said.

“I’m not only fighting for me, I’m fighting for all the other patients that are on this drug.”

You’re scrolling online when you spot a campaign T-shirt supporting your favorite candidate. The website looks professional, the merchandise looks legitimate and the address includes the candidate’s name. You might even see the word “official” at the top of the page. So, you assume your purchase supports the campaign. But what if the candidate has nothing to do with that store?

With the Nov. 3 midterm elections approaching, new research shared with CyberGuy reveals a troubling discovery in Texas. Researchers at cybersecurity company Attaxion identified 626 unofficial election-related domains, including 30 online merchandise stores presenting themselves as official campaign shops.

Attaxion says it could not verify an official campaign connection for any of the 30 stores. Even more surprising, researchers found that nearly all appeared to come from just two sellers offering merchandise for competing Republicans and Democrats. The findings arrive as the FBI warns about election-related scams involving fake merchandise, fraudulent donations and websites designed to steal personal information. And while this investigation focuses on Texas, the warning signs apply to elections and online shopping across the country.

Join our upcoming CyberGuy LIVE class: 5 Ways to Travel Smarter and Save Money

In this free live online class, Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson will share five practical ways to protect your trip and your wallet this holiday travel season. You’ll learn how to secure your phone and personal information, find better travel deals, avoid common scams, save money on bookings and use technology to make your travels easier and less stressful. No technical experience is needed.

Join us Saturday, October 31, at 11 AM ET / 8 AM PT. Register free now at CyberGuyLive.com.

DON’T LET FAKE ELECTION WEBSITES FOOL YOU BEFORE 2026 MIDTERMS

Researchers uncover 626 unofficial Texas election domains

Texas voters are already heading to the polls. Early voting for the Nov. 3 general election began Oct. 19 and continues through Oct. 30. Meanwhile, researchers are finding that candidates’ names have become valuable online real estate. Attaxion, a cybersecurity company that helps organizations identify vulnerable websites and other online threats, examined domains connected to the state’s U.S. Senate race, governor’s race and six competitive congressional districts. The investigation also included websites resembling election offices and voter information pages.

Researchers initially identified 704 domains. After excluding 25 official sites and another 53 domains connected to campaigns or election offices, 626 unofficial addresses remained. Of those, 553 had DNS records when checked. That means the domains had some internet configuration, although it does not establish that each hosted an active website. The Senate race accounted for 323 unofficial domains. Another 75 referenced House candidates, while 70 used gubernatorial candidates’ names. The remaining domains referenced election offices or general election-related terms.

Importantly, an unofficial domain is not automatically a scam. Some may belong to supporters, critics or independent businesses. Others may be registered without hosting an active website. However, the researchers identified a smaller group that deserves closer attention.

30 Texas campaign merchandise stores raise questions

Of the 626 unofficial domains, Attaxion identified 30 online stores that presented themselves as official merchandise sellers for Texas political candidates. The stores promoted products associated with Republican U.S. Senate candidate Ken Paxton and Democratic opponent James Talarico. Others used the names of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and his Democratic challenger, Gina Hinojosa.

Researchers also identified stores featuring congressional candidates. Alexandre François, research contributor at Attaxion, worked on the investigation and shared the findings with CyberGuy. “Two things stood out. The first is how little the politics seem to matter to the people selling,” François told CyberGuy.

He explained that nearly all the stores appeared to come from the same two sellers, despite promoting candidates from opposing parties. In Texas’ 23rd Congressional District, researchers found stores supporting the Republican and Democratic nominees that appeared to share an operator. That raises an obvious question. If a business is selling merchandise for competing candidates, is it really connected to either campaign? According to the investigation, none of the 30 stores could be verified as campaign-operated.

Two sellers appear to control nearly all 30 stores

Attaxion traced most of the merchandise websites to two seller identities: ShirtGoat and madetoprints. ShirtGoat appeared to operate 12 stores and was likely connected to two more. Meanwhile, madetoprints was associated with another 15. The researchers found that both sellers used similar website templates while swapping out candidates’ names and merchandise. Some sites also borrowed slogans that appeared on official campaign products.

For example, when Talarico’s campaign responded to a political nickname with an “I’m a Talafreako” shirt, similar products appeared in three unofficial stores. “It suggests that the motive is most likely commercial rather than political,” François explained. “Someone with a political agenda would be unlikely to sell merchandise for both sides of the same race.”

Researchers also noticed that several domains were registered on the same day. Some stores reused identical policies with only the candidate’s name changed. A few terms-of-service pages even contained apparent chatbot responses left behind during the creation process. That suggests some operators may be creating these stores quickly and repeatedly. However, the researchers could not establish the legal identities of the people controlling all the websites.

Why these political merchandise websites look legitimate

One of the biggest challenges is how convincing the stores can appear. A website might feature professional product photos and familiar campaign slogans. It may also offer a functional shopping cart with a normal-looking checkout. Those features can create confidence before someone even thinks to check who operates the business. François says that assumption can be risky. “The first thing to know is that appearance is no longer a reliable guide. With AI, anyone can quickly build a polished store with well-written text, so the old signs of poor design and clumsy language rarely apply, and neither does the word ‘official.’”

Attaxion found that none of the 30 unofficial stores included the campaign-related “Paid for by” disclosure the researchers expected to see. However, independent businesses selling political merchandise are not automatically required to display campaign finance disclaimers. The missing disclosure is one warning sign, not proof of fraud or a legal violation. The stores also failed to provide a verifiable company identity and business address. Some listed a seller name or customer service email address. However, those details did not establish an official relationship with a candidate.

To investigate the websites, Attaxion compared them against verified campaign information from the Federal Election Commission and Texas Ethics Commission. Researchers also examined registration records and revisited the stores on Oct. 20 to check their contact pages, policies and checkout processes. None of those checks established a connection to the campaigns.

119,000 FAKE SHOPS COULD STEAL YOUR CREDIT CARD DETAILS

A former election website now promotes an online casino

The researchers uncovered another unusual example involving an expired election website. The domain elpasoelections.com sounds like it could belong to an election office in El Paso, Texas. However, it previously served El Paso County in Colorado. That county used the address for election information for years before allowing its registration to lapse in February 2026. A domain buyer acquired the address in May.

When researchers examined the website, it displayed an online casino promoting itself to Australian users. The investigation identified a new registrant organization associated with Hong Kong, although that record does not independently establish who operates the casino.

François highlighted the discovery as an example of how a once-legitimate web address can change hands. “It is a good reminder that a familiar-looking address does not tell you who holds it today.”

The example extends well beyond politics. An expired website previously used by a government office, nonprofit or business can eventually lead somewhere completely unrelated. For accurate Texas election information, the state’s official website is VoteTexas.gov. For voting information elsewhere in the country, you can start with Vote.gov.

FBI warns about election merchandise and donation scams

The Texas findings follow an Oct. 15 warning from the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center. The agency warned that criminals exploit political campaigns to target people across the United States. Some scammers impersonate candidates to solicit fraudulent contributions. Others advertise political merchandise that customers never receive.

The FBI also warned about fraudulent voter-registration messages that direct people to websites designed to collect personal information. Artificial intelligence can make these schemes harder to recognize. Criminals can generate convincing written messages and realistic voices that appear to come from legitimate organizations. However, there’s an important limitation to the Texas investigation.

Attaxion did not determine whether customers lost money through the 30 stores.

“At this stage we do not know. We did not place test orders, and our research does not include payment records or customer complaints, so we have no evidence either way,” François told CyberGuy.

The researchers also did not investigate whether the operators promoted their stores through Google ads, social media or political text messages. They did examine observed DNS traffic and found that some unofficial domains had received lookups. However, those records cannot establish how someone discovered a website or whether they completed a purchase. The findings raise concerns about misleading campaign connections without proving that all the stores committed fraud.

How to protect yourself from fake campaign websites and online scams

These precautions apply to political merchandise stores and fundraising pages nationwide. They can also help you recognize ordinary shopping scams and websites that impersonate trusted organizations.

1. Start with a website you can verify

Before buying political merchandise or making a donation, find the candidate’s established campaign website. Look for the merchandise or contribution page linked directly from that website. For federal candidates, you can also use the Federal Election Commission’s database to verify campaign committees and find their reported information. If you’re shopping from an unfamiliar retailer, visit its official website independently rather than following a promotional link. This approach also works when someone claims to represent a bank, charity or government agency.

2. Check the full website address

Scammers and unauthorized sellers can register web addresses that closely resemble legitimate ones. Look for misspellings or added words that make an unfamiliar address appear trustworthy. Don’t assume a website belongs to an organization simply because the address contains its name or the word “official.” You can also use a WHOIS lookup to investigate when a domain was registered. A newly created website deserves closer attention, especially when it claims to represent an established organization. However, domain age alone cannot establish whether a website is legitimate. And remember, HTTPS encryption protects information while it travels between your browser and a website. It does not prove that the site’s operator is trustworthy.

WHY VERIFIED SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS CAN STILL LEAD YOU INTO A SCAM

3. Verify who receives your money

Before contributing to a political campaign, confirm the organization receiving the payment. Federal political committee websites generally must include a disclaimer identifying who paid for the communication. When applicable, the disclosure also identifies the campaign or committee that authorized it. Look for a “Paid for by” statement and compare the information with official campaign records. Many political campaigns use fundraising platforms such as ActBlue or WinRed. Others use different payment systems. The key is reaching the contribution page through the campaign’s verified website. Independent businesses may legally sell political merchandise without supporting a campaign. However, they should not mislead you about who receives your money. A missing or suspicious disclosure deserves attention, but a disclaimer alone does not guarantee legitimacy.

4. Investigate unfamiliar sellers before purchasing

Take a closer look at any online store you’ve never used before. Search for the company name along with terms such as “reviews,” “complaints” or “scam.” Read its return and refund policies. Look for a legitimate way to reach customer support. The Better Business Bureau at bbb.org/ can be another place to check for complaints, although the absence of complaints does not prove a company is trustworthy. If you cannot establish who operates a website, consider buying elsewhere.

5. Be skeptical of unexpected texts and emails

A scammer may send a message claiming that your voter registration needs attention. Another might pressure you to contribute immediately or purchase merchandise before an offer disappears. The same tactics appear in fake bank alerts and fraudulent delivery notifications. Avoid clicking payment or account-verification links in unsolicited messages. Instead, open the organization’s established website yourself. For election-related messages, check information through Vote.gov or your state election office. Be especially cautious about messages asking for passwords, Social Security numbers or payment details.

6. Use safer payment methods

When shopping online, paying with a credit card generally gives you stronger protections if an order never arrives or a charge is incorrect. Avoid unfamiliar sellers that insist on payment through gift cards, cryptocurrency or wire transfers. Those methods can make recovering your money difficult. Keep your purchase confirmation and review your statements after paying. Also, check whether a political contribution involves recurring payments before submitting it. The FTC’s online shopping guide explains how to research sellers and protect yourself when making purchases.

7. Protect your accounts and personal information

A suspicious shopping site may ask you to create an account before checking out. Never reuse a password from your email, banking or other important accounts. Use a password manager to create unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication (2FA) when available. Strong antivirus software can also help detect malicious downloads and block some dangerous websites. However, it cannot verify whether a political merchandise store is actually affiliated with a campaign. Be selective about the information you share, especially when you cannot verify who operates the website. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.

What to do if you already paid a suspicious website

If you’ve purchased merchandise or sent money through a questionable website, act promptly when something appears wrong.

• Contact the seller if an order never arrived. If the seller doesn’t resolve the problem, contact your card issuer about disputing the charge. If you suspect fraud or see unauthorized charges, contact your bank or card issuer immediately.
• Save your records. Keep receipts, confirmation emails and screenshots showing the website address and payment details.
• Review your accounts. Look for unfamiliar transactions or recurring payments you did not authorize.
• Change reused passwords. Update any other account where you used the same login information.
• Report suspected fraud. File a report with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov/ or the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov/. You can also contact your state attorney general’s consumer protection office.

If you entered sensitive identity information into a suspicious website, visit IdentityTheft.gov for personalized recovery guidance.

Kurt’s key takeaways

What stands out to me about this investigation is that the people behind these stores appear willing to sell merchandise for candidates on both sides of the same race. That raises serious questions about what shoppers are being led to believe. I have no problem with an independent business selling political merchandise. But I do have a problem when a website gives people the impression they’re supporting an official campaign without making clear who’s actually taking their money. And here’s something else worth remembering. The FBI is already warning about election scams involving merchandise that never arrives and fake donation requests. Meanwhile, AI makes it easier than ever to create a convincing website. I wouldn’t judge a store by its design or the word “official” in its address. I’d go straight to the organization I want to support and use the links it provides. The same advice applies when you’re shopping online or responding to an unexpected request for money. A few extra moments of checking can make a difference.

Have you ever purchased something from a website you thought was official, only to discover later that it wasn’t connected to the company or organization you wanted to support? Should websites that falsely claim official affiliations face tougher consequences? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Newsletter

• Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
• For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
• Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Scotland men emulated their female counterparts by opening the European Curling Championships with victory.

Grant Hardie’s rink triumphed 8-4 in Ostrava in the Czech Republic and face Belgium later on Wednesday.

The men picked up two at the opening end and three at the third to lead 5-1. The Dutch were 6-4 down after six ends but Scotland picked up two more at the seventh to see out the win.

Fay Henderson’s Scotland women began their campaign with a comprehensive 12-3 victory over Denmark.

They edged the opening two ends by single points before the Danes halved the deficit.

However, the Scots took control of their opening, surging into a five-point lead by the close of the fourth end.

Although Denmark scored two points in the fifth, Scotland ended the contest emphatically with a six-point haul in the sixth and final end.

Turkey are up next for Henderson’s rink.

An Egyptian farmer tending to his cucumbers stumbled upon an ancient stone that led archaeologists to a much bigger discovery.

They found the remains of two colossal statues believed to depict Ramses II, the pharaoh some scholars believe may have confronted Moses in the biblical Book of Exodus.

The finds were announced by the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities earlier this month. 

ANCIENT EGYPTIAN SETTLEMENT DISCOVERED FROM ERA THAT FUELED EXODUS DEBATE

The farmer found the inscribed stone while working in a cucumber greenhouse on his property in the village of Behbeit El-Hagar, according to Egyptian news outlet Youm7.

The man then alerted local archaeological authorities, who inspected the site and uncovered the remains of two statues during subsequent excavations, ministry officials said. 

“One of the statues has been identified as depicting King Ramses II, while the other is also believed to represent the same pharaoh,” the translated statement read.

“The mission additionally discovered a pink granite block bearing hieroglyphic inscriptions that include several of the king’s royal titles.”

Ramses II, who was born in 1303 B.C., was among the most powerful and influential pharaohs of ancient Egypt’s New Kingdom period.

ARCHAEOLOGISTS UNEARTH ANCIENT TREASURE CACHE AT BIBLICAL CITY CONNECTED TO GENESIS

Some scholars have suggested that Ramses II was the pharaoh described in the Book of Exodus, although the Old Testament does not identify the ruler by name.

In the biblical account, the pharaoh refuses Moses’ demands to free the Israelites, leading to a series of devastating plagues. Ramses II died in 1213 B.C.

The first statue features a colossal head of Ramses II measuring more than 5 feet tall, officials said. 

The pharaoh is depicted wearing a double crown, symbolizing the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, while an inscription on the statue’s back pillar bears one of his royal names.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER

Archaeologists estimate the original statue, including its base, may have stood nearly 28 feet tall.

The second statue, also believed to depict Ramses II, measures nearly 8 feet long and is missing its legs and base.

“The statue’s head was also uncovered, with its facial features still clearly visible and well-preserved,” officials said of the second statue. “These features closely resemble those of the first statue.”

Excavations and archaeological studies at the site are ongoing, officials added.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE NEWS

“These investigations are expected to help researchers develop a clearer understanding of the two statues, the area’s history and its architectural development during ancient Egyptian times,” the statement concluded.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The discovery is the latest in a series of archaeological finds shedding new light on the ancient Egyptian ruler.

In a similar discovery, archaeologists in Egypt unearthed a massive statue believed to depict King Ramses II at a Nile Delta site northeast of Cairo earlier this year.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Last year, Fox News Digital spoke with Jean-Guillaume Olette-Pelletier, an Egyptologist who identified ancient propaganda praising Ramses II on a 3,300-year-old obelisk in Paris’ Place de la Concorde.

Andy Burnham has been forced to issue a response after a petition has reached a major landmark calling for an independent investigation into the government’s actions

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has been forced to issue a major announcement after a parliamentary petition has passed a major landmark. A petition calling for the government to launch a public inquiry has passed more than 20,000 signatures.

Concerned campaigners are calling for an investigation into the UK’s relationship with Israel’s actions in Gaza over the last three years.

The petition posted on the UK government website passed 28,000 signatures at the time of writing. It is set to close in April 2027. If the petition reaches 100,000 signatures, the inquiry will be considered for a debate in parliament. Due to the petition passing 10,000 signatures the government will be forced to issue a response to the campaign.

A statement coupled with the petition reads: “We want the UK Government to launch an inquiry into any British involvement in Israeli operations in Gaza, including the sale, supply or use of weapons, surveillance aircraft and Royal Air Force bases.

“We believe the UK has played a vital role in Israeli military operations in Gaza.

“We call on the UK Government to launch a fully independent inquiry into the UK’s involvement since October 2023, which would have the power to question government ministers and officials involved in decision-making processes, particularly relating to: what arms have been supplied to Israel, what RAF bases have been used and why; what intelligence was collected during RAF flights; and what legal advice has the UK Government sought in assessing whether a genocide has taken place in Gaza.”

Andy Burnham has not label Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. The PM has insisted the government will follow the determination of international courts rather than make a political judgment. Israel has denied allegations of commenting genocide.

The development comes after Andy Burnham declared “Britain will continue to act in support of our values” after his government announced sanctions targeting illegal West Bank settlements.

Burnham insisted the measures are directed “not at the Israeli people”, but towards achieving peace across the region. The UK has accused the Israeli government of turning a blind eye to the “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians.

The Prime Minister stated: “In an increasingly volatile world, Britain must be willing to lead. The British people expect it, as do our international partners, and I am determined my Government will continue to act in defence of our values.

“Today, we are bringing forward targeted measures aimed not at the Israeli people, but in support of the two-state solution – and the prospect of Israelis and Palestinians living side by side in peace.

“The suffering of the Palestinian people is a scar on the conscience of the world. Innocent Palestinians, including children, continue to be killed in Gaza. And there is still a humanitarian crisis, with far too little aid getting in. That’s why we are acting and why Britain will continue to act in support of our values.”

As soon as the weather crisps up, you’ll find me incorporating brown lipstick into my everyday fall makeup routine, and after years of collecting the shade, I have too many of them to count. From warm-toned hues to metallic lip colors and brown lip liners, the shade is a lot more versatile than meets the eye. And the best part? “All skin tones and undertones look great with it,” says Kasey Spickard, a professional makeup artist in New York City.

Here, we’re breaking down what to look for when shopping for a brown lipstick, how to choose the right shade based on your undertones and preferences, and other makeup tips.

What to look for when shopping for brown lipstick

The makeup artists we spoke with recommend looking for formulas with heavy pigmentation and a long-lasting finish. “I want something rich and unctuous with rich brown tones and a high pigment load (like the consistency of a liquid lipstick). I want the color to be consistent and not patchy, which can happen with a lot of brown lipsticks,” says Spickard.

Brown lipsticks (or glosses) also come in a variety of finishes—matte, glossy, shimmery, or metallic. “It’s also good to keep in mind that lighter, nude browns will give you a more natural finish, while deeper browns, especially those that have a matte finish, make a statement,” says Brielle Pollara, a professional makeup artist based in New Jersey.

Do undertones matter in brown lipstick?

Choosing a brown lipstick for you highly depends on the undertone, not of your skin but of the lipstick itself, says to Tim Quinn, a celebrity makeup artist and founder of skin-care maker Halo 42. “Brown can lean golden, peach, rose, red, or mauve, and that little shift changes everything. I’m less interested in a strict rule about who can wear which shade than in finding harmony with the skin, cheeks, and eyes,” he says. If a brown makes you look dull or tired, try one with a little more rose or warmth and see what happens.

How to choose a brown lipstick for your complexion and style

Similar to finding the right complexion products for your routine, finding the right brown lipstick comes down to choosing a hue that will work with your undertones. “Usually the rule of thumb is to pick a cool-toned lipstick if you have a cooler, blue undertone or fairer skin, and opt for a warm-toned lipstick if you have warm or olive undertones and deeper skin,” says Spickard. You can also choose a brown lipstick based on the vibe you’re going for, as a cool-toned hue can give you a nostalgic ’90s finish, while something warmer like a chocolate brown can read more autumnal and rich.

Professional makeup artist Jonet Williamson also offers up a tip if you’re new to wearing brown lipstick: “Opting for shades that can be worn more sheer versus full-on opaque may be a more comfortable place to start, which is why I always recommend Glossier Ultralip in Crest because it’s easy to sheer out, or you can make it more opaque with a few layers—it also suits a ton of complexions.”

How to wear brown lipstick

While it’s completely up to preference on how you want to wear your brown lip, makeup artists have a few thoughts on how they’d style the look. “When I do brown lipstick shades, I like to go toasty brown lids and dark brown liner with a super lashy, full mascara, and individual lashes. I think the monochromatic look makes so much sense with brown lipstick. Think toasty-girl fall,” says Spickard.